-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
Is license MIT? #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Exactly! 🙂 |
Nice! 👍 I remember that FreeRTOS changed its license from `Modified GPL license` to the MIT license several years ago. I think that this is the same impact. |
Hello, I've forked and cloned the repo and I'm looking files. I have a question. This repo has files which have the LGPL 2.1 license statements and non-corporate copyrights. For example: https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-renesas/blob/main/libraries/EEPROM/src/EEPROM.h
My understanding is that the files in the following folder are the MIT license. Is my understanding right? https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-renesas/tree/main/cores/arduino Best regards, |
Hello, I'm looking files. The following folder contains files which have the LGPL 2.1 license statements and non-corporate copyright. https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-renesas/tree/main/cores/arduino/usb For example: https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-renesas/blob/main/cores/arduino/usb/USB.cpp
Best regards, |
But files in subfolders and the Serial.h file are excluded. Related link: Is license MIT? arduino#3
Hello, I'm looking files in the cores/arduino folder. I have a question. Is there any reason that MIT License statements shouldn't be added to each file? I made a DOS batch file to add the statements to each file and push the updated files to my repo. For example: Updated: Original: https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-renesas/blob/main/cores/arduino/Arduino.h Best regards, P.S. The DOS batch file is the following:
Best regards, |
Well, that's neat, but doesn't really help us. If there are missing license statements then please open a PR adding them. I'll be closing this PR as the initial question has been answered. |
Hello,
Yesterday, the LICENSE file was added. It is the MIT license. Is it right?
Best regards,
NoMaY
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: