Skip to content

Bi directional dijkstra #7982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Nov 20, 2022

Conversation

SwayamInSync
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass require tests Tests [doctest/unittest/pytest] are required require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html labels Nov 13, 2022
Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed require tests Tests [doctest/unittest/pytest] are required require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html labels Nov 13, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 13, 2022
Comment on lines 120 to 139
graph_fwd = {
"B": [["C", 1]],
"C": [["D", 1]],
"D": [["F", 1]],
"E": [["B", 1], ["G", 2]],
"F": [],
"G": [["F", 1]],
}
graph_bwd = {
"B": [["E", 1]],
"C": [["B", 1]],
"D": [["C", 1]],
"F": [["D", 1], ["G", 1]],
"G": [["E", 2]],
}
print(
bidirectional_dij("E", "F", graph_fwd, graph_bwd)
) # # E -- 2 --> G -- 1 --> F == 3

if __name__ == "__main__":
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be moved within the if name == main

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cannot put graph_fwd and graph_bwd inside any other scope because it was giving error in the GitHub workflow while running test that graph_fwd is not defined

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 5 28 41 PM

Copy link
Contributor Author

@SwayamInSync SwayamInSync Nov 14, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It has to stay the global scope, I did moved it inside if __name__ == "__main__ and it is working locally but somehow not passing this GitHub workflow

@CaedenPH
Copy link
Contributor

CaedenPH commented Nov 13, 2022

Please fix the checks as well
(lines 9 & 10 are too long)

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 14, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 14, 2022
@SwayamInSync
Copy link
Contributor Author

All check blockers are resolved @CaedenPH

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 14, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 14, 2022
Comment on lines +109 to +124
graph_fwd = {
"B": [["C", 1]],
"C": [["D", 1]],
"D": [["F", 1]],
"E": [["B", 1], ["G", 2]],
"F": [],
"G": [["F", 1]],
}
graph_bwd = {
"B": [["E", 1]],
"C": [["B", 1]],
"D": [["C", 1]],
"F": [["D", 1], ["G", 1]],
"E": [[None, np.inf]],
"G": [["E", 2]],
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move this within the doctest - its why it failed earlier

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 15, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Nov 18, 2022
@ChrisO345 ChrisO345 merged commit f01a1af into TheAlgorithms:master Nov 20, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Nov 20, 2022
Cjkjvfnby pushed a commit to Cjkjvfnby/Python that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
* Added Bi-Directional Dijkstra

* Added Bi-Directional Dijkstra

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Added doctest and type hints

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Rename Bi_directional_Dijkstra.py to bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

* Update bi_directional_dijkstra.py

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants