Skip to content

Create non_preemptive_shortest_job_first.py #6169

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Bynnn
Copy link
Contributor

@Bynnn Bynnn commented May 24, 2022

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@ghost ghost added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label May 24, 2022
@ghost ghost added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label May 25, 2022
Copy link
Member

@poyea poyea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might want to take a look at https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Python/blob/master/scheduling/shortest_job_first.py. Because your implementation is more maintainable, it's okay to replace some of its code, e.g. in calculate_waitingtime but it's up to you.

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
# SJF
"""
Non-preemptive Shortest Job First
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think SJF is non-preemptive itself? So I think this program is similar to https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Python/blob/master/scheduling/shortest_job_first.py

so we can get rid of non_preemptive_ from filename

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The SJF is a non-preemptive scheduling algorithm.
I should name mine without non_preemptive_, but there is the same name but different algorithm. (what you mentioned)
The existing program is a preemptive variant of SJF.
So I add non_preemptive_ to distinguish them.

If we get rid of non_preemptive_, I think the other filename(original shortest_job_first.py) also should be renamed to shortest_remaining_time.py.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah ok, you may rename scheduling/shortest_job_first.py to scheduling/preemptive_shortest_job_first.py

def calculate_waitingtime(
arrival_time: list[int], burst_time: list[int], no_of_processes: int
) -> list[int]:

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

and has remaining execution time is put into the ready_process.
The shortest process in the ready_process, target_process is executed.
"""
while completed != no_of_processes:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ghost ghost removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Jun 6, 2022
Copy link
Member

@poyea poyea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your pull request!🤩

@poyea poyea merged commit c86aa72 into TheAlgorithms:master Jun 6, 2022
@ghost ghost removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Jun 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants