Skip to content

remove function overhead #2233

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2020
Merged

remove function overhead #2233

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2020

Conversation

lance-pyles
Copy link
Contributor

add type hints

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @lance-pyles,
Something went wrong with the build.

TravisCI finished with status errored, which means the build failed because of something unrelated to the tests, such as a problem with a dependency or the build process itself.

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 9fad9e40-cde2-11ea-98fb-f5dcae6af814

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ def surface_area_cube(side_length: Union[int, float]) -> float:
>>> surface_area_cube(3)
54
"""
return 6 * pow(side_length, 2)
return 6 * side_length ** 2
Copy link
Member

@cclauss cclauss Jul 24, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we going to bounce back and forth every 48 hours? #2223 (review) ;-)

maths/area.py Outdated
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
from typing import Union
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Travis not happy... ./maths/area.py:5:1: F401 'typing.Union' imported but unused

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I swear that line keeps coming back by itself :)

@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Jul 24, 2020

Should I merge it quick before that import reappears?!?

Copy link
Member

@poyea poyea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe...the Union now disappears. Thank you for your pull request!🤩

@poyea poyea merged commit 093a56e into TheAlgorithms:master Jul 27, 2020
@poyea
Copy link
Member

poyea commented Jul 27, 2020

How about we just leave it there? Or we can ignore this file

@lance-pyles lance-pyles deleted the area-fixes branch July 27, 2020 15:56
stokhos pushed a commit to stokhos/Python that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2021
* remove function overhead
add type hints

* remove unused import
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants