Skip to content

Numerous fixes to directed_and_undirected_(weighted)_graph.py #2182

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2020

Conversation

cclauss
Copy link
Member

@cclauss cclauss commented Jul 6, 2020

Describe your change:

  1. Simplify imports
  2. __ is not a valid variable name for a variable that is referred to multiple times.
  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@cclauss cclauss merged commit 2c75a7b into master Jul 6, 2020
@cclauss cclauss deleted the directed_and_undirected_weighted_graph.py branch July 6, 2020 17:31
stokhos pushed a commit to stokhos/Python that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2021
…orithms#2182)

* Numerous fixes to directed_and_undirected_(weighted)_graph.py

* dict.keys() is almost never need in modern Python
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants