Skip to content

Divide and Conquer #1308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2019
Merged

Divide and Conquer #1308

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2019

Conversation

realDuYuanChao
Copy link
Member

@realDuYuanChao realDuYuanChao commented Oct 8, 2019

Find max and min value using Divide and Conquer algorithms

:param nums: contains elements
:param left: index of first element
:param right: index of last element
:return: min in nums
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:return: says min but should say max.

Also, add doctests as discussed in CONTRIBUTING.md

>>> nums = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
>>> find_max(nums, 0, len(nums) - 1) = max(nums)
True

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated, Thanks for your review! @cclauss

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both files need doctests like the one above.

Copy link
Member Author

@realDuYuanChao realDuYuanChao Oct 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please review again! @cclauss

Copy link
Member Author

@realDuYuanChao realDuYuanChao Oct 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:return: says min but should say max.

Also, add doctests as discussed in CONTRIBUTING.md

>>> nums = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
>>> find_max(nums, 0, len(nums) - 1) = max(nums)
True

I updated as you say, correct?

:param right: index of last element
:return: max in nums

>>find_max([1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10], 0, 9) == 10
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

greater than >, greater than >, greater than >, space

If not, it is not recognizing as a test.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you mean like this nums = [9, 7, 5, 3, 2, 1] ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope. I mean:

  >>> find_max(...
# not...
  >>find_max(...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I corrected follow as you say.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please review again! @cclauss

@realDuYuanChao
Copy link
Member Author

Please review again @cclauss

:return: max in nums
"""

"""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove lines 9 and 11.

:param right: index of last element
:return: min in nums
"""

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove lines 9 and 11.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change done?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes!Done

@realDuYuanChao
Copy link
Member Author

Please review again! @cclauss

@realDuYuanChao
Copy link
Member Author

@cclauss Did you forget review?😹

@cclauss cclauss merged commit 83c104e into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 18, 2019
@realDuYuanChao realDuYuanChao deleted the patch-1 branch November 3, 2019 13:22
stokhos pushed a commit to stokhos/Python that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2021
Thanks for your persistence!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants