-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
tests: improve for GeneratePermutations #1263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The original insertBalance function was doing raw value comparisons as opposed to using the tree's comparator. This is clearly unintentional, and would (ultimately) cause the structure to segfault when constructed with the stringData included in the updated test. I've added the fix, scanned the rest of the code for similar issues, and added the appropriate test case which passes successfully with the fix. The jest code coverage increases slightly as well with the changes.
Added a couple of extra elements to the original test tree, and then removed elements in an order such that all previously uncovered branches of code are now covered. Also added an emptyTree structure to test some additional (trivial) base cases.
missed this from my previous commit
An iterative analog to the traditional recursive breadth-first-search algorithm for binary trees. This in-place solution uses the pre-existing "traversal" array for both tracking the algorithm as well as storing the result. Also tweaked old code by resetting the traversal array each time the tree is traversed (otherwise you're only allowed to traverse a tree once which doesn't seem correct even with a single traversal function).
got rid of unnecessary currentSize added currentNode for clarity
.. per earlier discussion w mods also tweaked the tests to achieve 100% coverage
Original test was very limited and also (unnecessarily) strict in that the order of results mattered. I've tweaked the original test so that results can come in any order. Also added additional tests for smaller arrays of strings/booleans. Finally added some sanity testing for larger input arrays.
appgurueu
reviewed
Nov 10, 2022
appgurueu
previously approved these changes
Nov 10, 2022
Factorials are now explicit in the last set of tests.
Leverage package's existing factorial function.
appgurueu
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2022
raklaptudirm
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your change:
The original test was very limited and enforced a strict ordering of the results which the algorithm doesn't guarantee. I've loosened that restriction, and added two extra "complete" tests containing elements besides numbers.
For tests where we don't want to hardcode every possible result I've added a sanity check that will at least verify whether the number of results is accurate.
Checklist:
Example:
UserProfile.js
is allowed butuserprofile.js
,Userprofile.js
,user-Profile.js
,userProfile.js
are notFixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}
.