Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable.
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:41:02 +0000 (19:41 -0500)
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:41:09 +0000 (19:41 -0500)
commit1b4d280ea1eb7ddb2e16654d5fa16960bb959566
tree2a6d78d52bf86e0388ed7ec9fd536861416d999f
parent2ff5ca86e816846743b31279a9f6b819d4cf4b11
Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable.

The rule system needs "old" and/or "new" pseudo-RTEs in rule actions
that are ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.  Historically it's put such entries
into the ON SELECT rules of views as well, but those are really quite
vestigial.  The only thing we've used them for is to carry the
view's relid forward to AcquireExecutorLocks (so that we can
re-lock the view to verify it hasn't changed before re-using a plan)
and to carry its relid and permissions data forward to execution-time
permissions checks.  What we can do instead of that is to retain
these fields of the RTE_RELATION RTE for the view even after we
convert it to an RTE_SUBQUERY RTE.  This requires a tiny amount of
extra complication in the planner and AcquireExecutorLocks, but on
the other hand we can get rid of the logic that moves that data from
one place to another.

The principal immediate benefit of doing this, aside from a small
saving in the pg_rewrite data for views, is that these pseudo-RTEs
no longer trigger ruleutils.c's heuristic about qualifying variable
names when the rangetable's length is more than 1.  That results
in quite a number of small simplifications in regression test outputs,
which are all to the good IMO.

Bump catversion because we need to dump a few more fields of
RTE_SUBQUERY RTEs.  While those will always be zeroes anyway in
stored rules (because we'd never populate them until query rewrite)
they are useful for debugging, and it seems like we'd better make
sure to transmit such RTEs accurately in plans sent to parallel
workers.  I don't think the executor actually examines these fields
after startup, but someday it might.

Amit Langote

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEf7gPN4Hn+LoZ4tP2q_Qt7n3vw7-6fJKOf92tSEnX6Gg@mail.gmail.com
34 files changed:
contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
src/backend/commands/lockcmds.c
src/backend/commands/view.c
src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c
src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c
src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c
src/backend/parser/parse_relation.c
src/backend/rewrite/rewriteDefine.c
src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
src/backend/utils/cache/plancache.c
src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl
src/include/catalog/catversion.h
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
src/test/regress/expected/aggregates.out
src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out
src/test/regress/expected/collate.icu.utf8.out
src/test/regress/expected/collate.linux.utf8.out
src/test/regress/expected/collate.out
src/test/regress/expected/compression.out
src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out
src/test/regress/expected/expressions.out
src/test/regress/expected/groupingsets.out
src/test/regress/expected/limit.out
src/test/regress/expected/matview.out
src/test/regress/expected/polymorphism.out
src/test/regress/expected/rangefuncs.out
src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
src/test/regress/expected/tablesample.out
src/test/regress/expected/triggers.out
src/test/regress/expected/updatable_views.out
src/test/regress/expected/window.out
src/test/regress/expected/with.out
src/test/regress/expected/xml.out
src/test/regress/expected/xml_2.out