bae868ca removed a check that was still needed. If you had an
xl_tot_len at the end of a page that was too small for a record header,
but not big enough to span onto the next page, we'd immediately perform
the CRC check using a bogus large length. Because of arbitrary coding
differences between the CRC implementations on different platforms,
nothing very bad happened on common modern systems. On systems using
the _sb8.c fallback we could segfault.
Restore that check, add a new assertion and supply a test for that case.
Back-patch to 12, like
bae868ca.
Tested-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tested-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLCkTT7zYjzOxuLGahBdQ%3DMcF%3Dz5ZvrjSOnW4EDhVjT-g%40mail.gmail.com
}
else
{
+ /* There may be no next page if it's too small. */
+ if (total_len < SizeOfXLogRecord)
+ {
+ report_invalid_record(state,
+ "invalid record length at %X/%X: expected at least %u, got %u",
+ LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(RecPtr),
+ (uint32) SizeOfXLogRecord, total_len);
+ goto err;
+ }
/* We'll validate the header once we have the next page. */
gotheader = false;
}
{
pg_crc32c crc;
+ Assert(record->xl_tot_len >= SizeOfXLogRecord);
+
/* Calculate the CRC */
INIT_CRC32C(crc);
COMP_CRC32C(crc, ((char *) record) + SizeOfXLogRecord, record->xl_tot_len - SizeOfXLogRecord);
$log_size),
"xl_tot_len short");
+# xl_tot_len in final position, not big enough to span into a new page but
+# also not eligible for regular record header validation
+emit_message($node, 0);
+$end_lsn = advance_to_record_splitting_zone($node);
+$node->stop('immediate');
+write_wal($node, $TLI, $end_lsn, build_record_header(1));
+$log_size = -s $node->logfile;
+$node->start;
+ok( $node->log_contains(
+ "invalid record length at .*: expected at least 24, got 1", $log_size
+ ),
+ "xl_tot_len short at end-of-page");
+
# Need more pages, but xl_prev check fails first.
emit_message($node, 0);
$end_lsn = advance_out_of_record_splitting_zone($node);