Doc: be more precise about conflicts between relation names.
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:12:02 +0000 (12:12 -0400)
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:12:02 +0000 (12:12 -0400)
commitaf8c580e5cf32bb85dde70083a260c93a1f783eb
tree87dc7c38d5b080f32d312b390b9282a232a45b81
parent65c6cab1365ac33b11a49a2a193f6b3f9c53e487
Doc: be more precise about conflicts between relation names.

Use verbiage like "The name of the table must be distinct from the name
of any other relation (table, sequence, index, view, materialized view,
or foreign table) in the same schema." in the reference pages for all
those object types.  The main change here is to mention materialized
views explicitly; although a couple of these pages failed to say
anything at all about name conflicts.

Per suggestion from Daniel Westermann.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZR0P278MB0920D0946509233459AF0DEFD2889@ZR0P278MB0920.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_foreign_table.sgml
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_index.sgml
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_materialized_view.sgml
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_view.sgml