Fix old, misleading comment for PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE.

The comment implies that we can eventually remove this, but per
discussion, we actually don't want to do that ever, in order to
maintain compatibility.

Jelte Fennema-Nio, reviewed by Tristan Partin

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQTO72jKed5461W8cytV2Msh_e+WUZjOyX_RUQCbjk4LRA@mail.gmail.com

diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h b/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h
index 8d3c5c6f66211dc359f110534efa88079b59e951..c184e853889e78587b291ca8c2c930a59460d475 100644 (file)
--- a/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h
+++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h
@@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ typedef enum
    PGRES_POLLING_READING,      /* These two indicate that one may    */
    PGRES_POLLING_WRITING,      /* use select before polling again.   */
    PGRES_POLLING_OK,
-   PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE        /* unused; keep for awhile for backwards
-                                * compatibility */
+   PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE        /* unused; keep for backwards compatibility */
 } PostgresPollingStatusType;
 
 typedef enum