We need insights into the storage consumption of active files and soft deleted files.   The Capacity Metrics App's Storage page should have the ability to show the storage size of soft deleted files and the storage size of active files. And the total.   Today, it is not possible to differentiate between storage size of soft deleted files and active files in the Capacity Metrics App. ... View more

When doing restore we always get a new database ID, Physical Name and SqlEndPoint, even if the database logical name is the same (eg restore over the top). This causes a massive increase in RTO as afer the restore all end points broke and configuration management had to be updated and re-tested. When doing a restore we need to have the ability to keep database exactly as it was, rather than always creating a clone. In a recent DR event it was 5 minutes to restore, but the 2 days before we stopped getting issues on end points and config change impact. ... View more

Hello,  Please add support for the "English (Europe)" display language in the Fabric portal (and reflect it in all workloads including reports). I work in a large multinational European company, here English is the common standard, but we strongly use standard metric/iso formats (not imperial which is used in English(United States) language). Also, all people across Europe (except the UK) use mostly metric/iso formats. This is very confusing and dangerous (due to the different meaning), especially for data and numeric values in reports. "English (Europe)" is a standard language implemented in Windows 10/11/Server, but is missing in Fabric. Thank you. ... View more

With the move to the new Fabric capacities, if you want to share reports and apps with clients or other non-licensed users, you need at least an F64 capacity. That is a very steep increase from the current situation where you can use an A1 capacity to achieve the same. While I understand that A capacities have been designed for embedding reports, currently you are able to share reports and apps with unlicensed users using A.That is an increase from USD $735 to USD $9811 (AUE in this example) a month. This is especially annoying if you are working in a global environment where you multiple regions with the requirement to keep data on-shore. That means, we would have to deploy an F64 capacity in each region, just to be able to share reports with our clients. That does not make any sense to me. I am happy to pay for as much Fabric computing power as I require, but I dont want to spend 10x more just to be able to share reports with clients. There are a few alternatives to avoid this issue, but I think they are all flawed: Continue using A capacities: You could continue using the A capacities for semantic models and reports and be able to share that with clients. And then an additional low F capacity (< F64). Since one workspace can only be associated with one capacity, it would require us to have 2 workspaces for each project, one connected to the Fabric capacity with all Fabric items, and one connected to the A1 capacity, containing all PBI items. That is a duplication of effort and not really practical Assigning clients and non-licenses users with PBI Pro: While PBI Pro is a bit overkill just to view reports, it seems acceptable for internal stakeholders. However, for clients that are just consuming reports for a short amount of time, it does really not make sense and introduces additional overheads. Please consider making sharing reports and apps available also in lower tier F capacities. ... View more

Currently it's not possible to monitor Gen2 capacity in terms of Memory usage over time which is essential for Capacity level management. It was very useful for Gen1 capacity. "Premium Capacity Utilization And Metrics" report generated by this App doesn't include this either. ... View more

We want F4 fabric SKU to be supported in Fabrics metrics app to analyze the capacity usage. ... View more

We want the ability to share a Spark session across users. ... View more

Develop table and matrix visual in a sense that is similar to how excel functions. There are limitations in creating rows and columns in matrix visuals such as adding a final column that is not a "total" of the values. Adding sparkline is also difficult for both visuals so I think you should focus on that as well ... View more

Create pie chart or bubble chart in Matrix Visual like sparkline features. It would be better to let user do more customization (X-axis/Y-axis configuration, tooltips) on sparkline. ... View more