Skip to content

feat: Exception Stack Trace Decoder for esp32 #1943

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

radurentea
Copy link

Exception Stack Trace Decoder for esp32 boards with emphasised data output

Motivation

Decoding exception stack trace

Change description

Adds a component component similar stylistically with the serial monitor in which the user can paste the backtrace.

Other information

Based on the decoder from the old arduino ide (https://github.com/me-no-dev/EspExceptionDecoder)

Reviewer checklist

  • [ x] PR addresses a single concern.
  • [x ] The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests before creating one)
  • [x ] PR title and description are properly filled.
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

I found a bug in which, the version of the tool in Arduino15 folder was different from the version the serial monitor was outputting, which would make the link unvalid (unreachable)
@radurentea radurentea closed this Mar 8, 2023
@radurentea radurentea deleted the feature/decoder-esp32 branch March 8, 2023 20:16
@radurentea radurentea restored the feature/decoder-esp32 branch March 8, 2023 20:37
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Mar 9, 2023
@per1234 per1234 added conclusion: duplicate Has already been submitted type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: code Related to content of the project itself labels Mar 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conclusion: duplicate Has already been submitted topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants