Added PrintOptions to Documentation

[shbenzer]

Added PrintOptions to the documentation

Description

added subsection on PrintOptions to Interaction section
added tests for each example

Motivation and Context

make documentation more comprehensive
Covers issue #1941

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	cf14e14

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Possible Bug In the setSeleniumVersion method, the logOutput variable is used instead of seleniumVersion Documentation Error The ShrinkToFit section incorrectly refers to getBackground() and setBackground() methods instead of getShrinkToFit() and setShrinkToFit()

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Correct a parameter mismatch in a method call Fix the typo in the setSeleniumVersion method where logOutput is used instead of seleniumVersion. website_and_docs/content/documentation/test_practices/design_strategies.en.md [216-219] public void setSeleniumVersion(String seleniumVersion) { WebElement field = driver.findElement(By.id("issue_form_selenium-version")); - clearAndType(field, logOutput); + clearAndType(field, seleniumVersion); } Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies and fixes a critical bug where the wrong variable logOutput is used instead of seleniumVersion. This correction is crucial for the method to function as intended.	9
Possible issue	Fix a syntax error in a method call Remove the extra parenthesis in the setTitle method's findElement call. website_and_docs/content/documentation/test_practices/design_strategies.en.md [67-70] public void setTitle(String title) { - WebElement field = driver.findElement(By.id("issue_title"))); + WebElement field = driver.findElement(By.id("issue_title")); clearAndType(field, title); } Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion addresses a syntax error by removing an extra parenthesis, which is essential for the code to compile and run correctly. This fix is important for ensuring the method's functionality.	8
Enhancement	Add assertions to verify the expected values of print options after setting them Consider adding assertions to verify the expected values after setting the print options. This will ensure that the options are correctly applied and maintained. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/interactions/PrintOptionsTest.java [15-17] PrintOptions printOptions = new PrintOptions(); printOptions.setOrientation(PrintOptions.Orientation.LANDSCAPE); PrintOptions.Orientation current_orientation = printOptions.getOrientation(); +assertEquals(PrintOptions.Orientation.LANDSCAPE, current_orientation); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding assertions to verify the expected values after setting the print options enhances the test's robustness by ensuring the options are correctly applied. This is a valuable improvement for test accuracy and reliability.	8
Performance	Optimize element locator strategy to improve performance and maintainability Replace the repeated driver.findElement() calls with a more efficient approach, such as using the @FindBy annotation or creating a map of element locators. website_and_docs/content/documentation/test_practices/design_strategies.en.md [187-214] +@FindBy(id = "issue_form_repro-command") +private WebElement howToReproduceField; + +@FindBy(id = "issue_form_logs") +private WebElement logOutputField; + +@FindBy(id = "issue_form_operating-system") +private WebElement operatingSystemField; + public void setHowToReproduce(String howToReproduce) { - WebElement field = driver.findElement(By.id("issue_form_repro-command")); - clearAndType(field, howToReproduce); + clearAndType(howToReproduceField, howToReproduce); } public void setLogOutput(String logOutput) { - WebElement field = driver.findElement(By.id("issue_form_logs")); - clearAndType(field, logOutput); + clearAndType(logOutputField, logOutput); } public void setOperatingSystem(String operatingSystem) { - WebElement field = driver.findElement(By.id("issue_form_operating-system")); - clearAndType(field, operatingSystem); + clearAndType(operatingSystemField, operatingSystem); } Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion to use @FindBy annotations instead of repeated driver.findElement() calls improves code maintainability and performance by reducing redundancy and enhancing readability. This is a valid and beneficial change.	7
Best practice	Use a setup method to initialize common objects and navigate to the website, reducing code duplication Consider using a setup method to initialize common objects and navigate to the website, reducing code duplication across test methods. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/interactions/PrintOptionsTest.java [13-18] +private PrintOptions printOptions; + +@BeforeEach +public void setup() { + driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/"); + printOptions = new PrintOptions(); +} + @Test -public void TestOrientation() +public void testOrientation() { - driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/"); - PrintOptions printOptions = new PrintOptions(); printOptions.setOrientation(PrintOptions.Orientation.LANDSCAPE); PrintOptions.Orientation current_orientation = printOptions.getOrientation(); + assertEquals(PrintOptions.Orientation.LANDSCAPE, current_orientation); } Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Implementing a setup method to initialize common objects and navigate to the website reduces code duplication and enhances test maintainability, making the tests cleaner and more efficient.	7
	Use constants for commonly used values to improve code maintainability and readability Consider using constants for commonly used values like page ranges, scales, and margins to improve code maintainability and readability. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/interactions/PrintOptionsTest.java [24-26] +private static final String DEFAULT_PAGE_RANGE = "1-2"; + PrintOptions printOptions = new PrintOptions(); -printOptions.setPageRanges("1-2"); +printOptions.setPageRanges(DEFAULT_PAGE_RANGE); String[] current_range = printOptions.getPageRanges(); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Using constants for commonly used values like page ranges improves code maintainability and readability by reducing magic numbers and making the code easier to update.	6
Maintainability	Consolidate similar test methods to reduce code duplication and improve test organization Consider consolidating similar test methods, such as TestScale() and TestSize(), which both set and get the scale value, to reduce code duplication and improve test organization. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/interactions/PrintOptionsTest.java [30-58] @Test -public void TestSize() +public void testScaleAndSize() { driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/"); PrintOptions printOptions = new PrintOptions(); - printOptions.setScale(.50); - double current_scale = printOptions.getScale(); + + // Test scale + printOptions.setScale(0.50); + assertEquals(0.50, printOptions.getScale(), 0.001); + + // Test size (if different from scale) + printOptions.setScale(0.75); + assertEquals(0.75, printOptions.getScale(), 0.001); } -@Test -public void TestScale() -{ - driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/"); - PrintOptions printOptions = new PrintOptions(); - printOptions.setScale(.50); - double current_scale = printOptions.getScale(); -} - Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Consolidating similar test methods can reduce code duplication and improve test organization, but the suggestion may oversimplify by combining tests that might have different purposes or setups.	5

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat